AI
Today · EstablishedToday · Established
Narrow systems that excel at specific trained tasks — transcription, image labeling, drafting — under human supervision.
See the comparisonIRA Space · Conceptual educational model
Today's AI is narrow and capable. AGI would match human breadth. ASI would surpass it entirely. Compare the three tiers side by side, then move sliders and watch a system get reclassified in real time.
No ASI system exists. Everything violet-colored here describes a hypothetical tier — not an observed capability.
Today · Established
Narrow systems that excel at specific trained tasks — transcription, image labeling, drafting — under human supervision.
See the comparisonThreshold · Conceptual
A system with human-level breadth: unfamiliar problems, cross-domain transfer, multi-day plans with limited supervision.
Test the boundaryIntellect far beyond humans in every domain — self-improving, self-directed research at scales no person could hold.
Why it's hypotheticalStep 1
Read 8 capability dimensions in plain language — no unexplained jargon.
Step 2
Set 7 sliders and watch the classification update instantly.
Step 3
Violet + “Hypothetical” always means speculation. Nothing here certifies a real system.
Evolution timeline →
Symbolic AI to agentic systems — and the hypothetical horizon.
Architecture explorers →
Click through conceptual AGI and ASI system designs.
Sources →
Every historical claim, in one central list.
Could this be AGI? →
Six questions, qualitative read — never a verdict.
Scenario simulator →
Same goal, four workers: human to hypothetical ASI.
Safety & alignment →
Six ideas and five failure modes, in plain language.
ModelMesh AI integration →
Real models on the same 0–10 dimensions — snapshot with methodology.